At Alamogordo, New Mexico in the atom was split and the atomic bomb explosion in the desert blasted that Law of Science out of existence. Now, if a Law of Science is so unreliable, I ask you, why is a mere theory like Evolution regarded so highly?
It is about political control, not about truth. The Missing Link.
7 Celestial Tips To Connect With Your Guardian Angel
In A. These items found in southern England in a place called Piltdown were estimated to be , years old.
For 40 years the remains were accepted by the academic community as an important part of our evolutionary development. Piltdown man was debunked four decades later by chemical tests proving the jaw and skull were not the same age, nor very old. The bones had been chemically treated and thoroughly stained to make them appear prehistoric. Recognizable anatomical features were broken off and filed down. Why did this fraud by lawyer Charles Dawson fool the experts?
Aboriginal astronomy can teach us about the link between sky and land
For many reasons, but it was never seriously questioned because the scientists of the time were delighted by the way it validated their evolutionist beliefs. Weiner, the classic account of the most famous and successful hoax in science. The new and revised edition is commonly available. The prover proves what the thinker thinks and prejudice and political power seem more important than the truth or the consistent practice of the scientific method.
If truth were important to them, they would use the scientific method when criticizing The Bible but they do not. The scientific method requires going to the source. Yet for these famous disparagements they use the King James version instead of the original Hebrew. The King James Translation is not at all accurate enough to use as the sole source for the defense of the Biblical Text.
Consider this example: One of the greatest conflicts between Science and the Bible is the teaching that the world was created in six solar days of 24 hours each. The word " yom " in the source, the original Hebrew text, which was translated as "Solar Day" had 56 other choices.
Modern English has more than 60, words. Biblical Hebrew had 3, The average English vocabulary has 6, My favorite choice of the 56 other options:" an unimaginably long but complete period of time" harmonizes with science perfectly. Another choice is: "time itself". So as we can see, going to the source and using the Scientific Method brings very different results than not going to the source.
Getting past this, the order in which life appeared was identical to the theory of evolution's claims in the Book of Genesis, leaving us to discuss the stars, the next main source of conflict between Science and the Bible. The Hebrew text says "a swaddling band around the Earth dissolved, revealing the stars. The Prover proves what the thinker thinks.
Here's a fun thought - What if GOD is in control of evolution? What if it's his hobby? What if there is really no conflict between Science and Religion? The scientists cannot disprove the existence of GOD any more than they can prove the Big Bang happened. Albert Einstein saw no conflict between science and religion. Therefore, I present to you this idea: Modern Scientific beliefs are based upon a leap of faith in the big bang theory. It has become a belief system based on faith and therefore another form of religion.
Scientists, like priests can explain their beliefs but the everyday people accept it all on faith. Scientists and doctors are the priests of this new religion, getting angry and crying "heresy" when anyone respectfully disagrees with them. I once had one of my supervisors in the UT anthropology department explain to me for three hours on a research expedition in mathematical terms how something could have ALWAYS existed, needing no beginning point.
Then there is the infusion of politics; a perfect example is. The Myth of Carbon 14 dating:. Educated people know that carbon 14 dating is totally irrelevant to the theory of evolution. Scientists never state that carbon 14 dating offers proof for the theory of evolution. Ignorant evolutionists, however, believe carbon 14 dating proves the theory of evolution, and stubbornly make that claim based on faith in what they were told in our learning institutions. I will explain; Carbon 14 dating is ONLY reliable for five thousand years as even its creator himself admitted in Carbon 14 or Radiocarbon Dating was first devised in by Dr.
Willard Libby. It is based on the rate of decay of carbon 14 or its "half-life" of years.
- syoujyohasyoujyonikoiwosuru (Japanese Edition).
- Something Concrete?
- John Ruskin's celestial city - Metropolis.
- The Luddite Girls.
- Navigation menu;
- Get PDF Sketches from a Celestial Sea - Guardian Angel?
This method offers reliable dates up to 5, years ago, but its results require correction since Dr. Libby's belief that the levels of carbon in the atmosphere were identical through the ages has long since been disproved. Volcanoes and floods for example skew the results to the point where guesswork or leaps of faith are required even in dating organic material from historic times. Libby once expressed his shock when he found that radio carbon dates for human artifacts extended back only years and older dates were found to be unreliable.
Shop By Category
The textbooks and curriculums have yet to be revised. Instead, a MYTH is being taught in our schools. There are exciting new methods but wild guesses about the amount of Carbon 14 in the atmosphere do not PROVE anything. Believers in GOD are called foolish and ignorant on the political strength of this deliberate lie that Carbon 14 dating proves evolution. The gross disrespect and intolerance I have seen of certain members of the scientific and academic communities and their disciples toward anyone who disagrees with them is just as arrogant and abusive as racial, sexual, religious, or any other kind of prejudice.
Here's a great example: Around in educated circles it was considered a mark of ignorance to believe the Biblical record. One excellent example is in what the Bible says about Abraham. In the early 20th century experts in the field of archaeology insisted that no civilization even existed in UR of the Chaldeans when the Bible records that Abraham lived there. On the basis that no evidence was currently available they declared Abraham a mythical character. Abraham's historicity is also confirmed by ancient inscriptions that bear the names of almost very town mentioned in Ch.
Archeological discoveries also show these towns were in existence until about 2, B. No longer can the Bible's critics get away with accusing us of being naive or foolish today when we believe what the Bible says about Abraham like they used to in the 20th century. This is critical to the belief systems of the world's great monotheistic religions Islam, Judaism and Christianity who all claim ascendancy from Abraham.
Why isn't this commonly taught in schools? Many scientific professionals openly abuse the authority of their positions to push their personal beliefs and ignore the confirmed scientific data to hold on to political power. Other Biblical confirmations from modern Archaeology include: Date and manner of Jericho's fall, The exodus from Egypt, Major characters from the book of Daniel and many others. Certain scientists and academics like to act like they know everything about the origins of the Earth.
They don't. Many of our long taught ideas about planetary science have recently been proven completely wrong. If they can't even tell us reliably how the solar system is today how can we rely on their ideas about its distant unobservable origins? Science is supposed to be the sum of the best knowledge we have at the time - incomplete but always learning, always growing- but sometimes making serious mistakes.
There is no danger to the foundation of the belief system of this new religion or it's social and political power base. Mankind's only hope for continued survival on this planet is to learn to tolerate each others differences and live in peace with one another and in harmony with the environment.
We're all in the same boat We all have a lot of work to do if we are to survive. If we're going to have a better world we're going to need both better leaders and better citizens. I personally believe that any belief in a higher power that must be answered to makes us better citizens than if we believed that we are the ultimate life form in the Universe.
Personal Opinion Essays on Realism yesterday and today by the artist. Howard David Johnson is an outspoken proponent of mechanical aids to visual art. Unlike the opponents of mechanical aids, his mission is not to prove his talent but to help preserve our vanishing Western cultural heritage. In addition to his mastery of the traditional media, now combines drawing, painting, photography, and digital media with more than thirty years of experience in these fields to create his Realistic Art Numerica in 21st century paintings and pictures. Did you know the Greek word "Photography" means "Painting with Light"?
Today with the advent of computers it truly lives up to it's name. Due to developments in Art and Technology, a broader definition of painting is needed than that which is found in common usage. Introducing Art Numerica- an exciting merger of traditional visual art and cutting edge technology Art Numerica is not limited to realistic art but also offers limitless horizons for everything from cartoons to abstractions.
It is the most dramatic development in the visual arts since the Renaissance.
Mode of Worship – Celestial Church of Christ
Since boyhood he has passionately copied the old masters. Using a strategy employed by J. Waterhouse The old master David has imitated most - his wistful and graceful models cannot be underestimated in their contribution to the stunning beauty and the potential for lasting appeal of his work.
To create his work, he usually starts with a thematic concept, then working in his Photography studio with live models. He then assembles a variety of elements which are realistic and original. As a boy he dedicated his life to art in From he used xeroxes and tracings to make his preliminary photo montages. For this he offers no apology as many of the greatest artists in history employed any and all means of technology at their disposal such as Camera Obscura or even the evil manufactured tube paints. The digital montage is a natural evolution of the preliminary photo collage David learned from great Realistic illustrators like Maxfield Parrish and Norman Rockwell.
You'd think by now everything would have been tried but it hasn't.
Related Sketches from a Celestial Sea - Guardian Angel
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved